And when I say "brief," I mean brief.
Gwendy's Button Box hit shelves yesterday, and thanks to the magic that is Amazon Prime, I received my copies (one hardback and one audiobook) mid-afternoon.
I waited until the end of the night to sit down with it, though, and that turned out to be okay, because I read it in one sitting. I say "one sitting," but technically, there were several sittings in there. The breaks were laundry-related, and I'm classifying them as pauses in the entire process, not in the actual reading. So I'm claiming it was "one sitting," and by damn, we're all gonna have to be okay with that.
Anyways, I enjoyed the book.
I don't actually want to say anything more than that. I went into it almost dead cold in terms of plot knowledge, which is how I like it. I have no intention of spoiling anything about it -- which is not to say that there's any kind of a Serling-esque plot twist to be spoiled (there isn't [unless there is and this is just a ruse to throw you off the scent (it isn't)]) -- even by hinting at specifics.
Which prompts a question: what am I going to say here?
The answer prompted in return: not much. "Brief," I said, and I meant it.
So here are a few salient facts, vague though they may be:
- It's a novella. Not a particularly long one, either. The audiobook -- to which I have not listened (I'm getting this info off the box) -- runs 2.5 hours. For comparison's sake, the audiobooks for the novella "Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption" runs nearly four hours. "Little Sisters of Eluria" is about the same length as "Gwendy's Button Box," roughly 150 minutes. The Gwendy's audiobook, however, also contains a reading of "The Music Room," which runs nearly 13 minutes, and a conversation between King and Chizmar, which runs another 6 minutes. So what I'm saying is, as novellas go, this is a pretty short one.
- Statements made by both King and Chizmar point to the fact that King came up with the concept for the story, hit a wall and couldn't figure out how to end it, then turned it over to Chizmar. Chizmar came up with an ending, but he and King bounced the story back and forth (the entirety of it, not merely the ending) and turned it into a genuine collaboration. So to me, it mostly just reads like King. His voice isn't insistent like it sometimes is, but the story's style is not at all inconsistent with some of recent short works. There were a few places where I found myself thinking, "I bet that's a Chizmar sentence," but I didn't think it in a negative manner. It's a solid piece of prose, and if you had any fears that King's voice might get lost in the collaboration, I'd say let 'em go. [For you Chizmar fans out there wondering the same thing about Richard's voice, I cannot address your concerns, being unfamiliar with his work.]
- It's a story set in mid-seventies Castle Rock. I don't want to say much about that, but will say a little, because I feel it'll be to the benefit of your enjoyment of the story: the setting matters not even a little bit. I wouldn't go so far as to accuse this of being a trifling use of the town, but I would go so far as to imply it.
- In terms of the content, the novella could have fit relatively well in either Four Past Midnight or, arguably, Full Dark, No Stars. In fact, if you removed "Fair Extension" from the latter, this would make an acceptable substitute as well as an interesting lead-in to "A Good Marriage." (Don't read too much into that last bit; it's just a reflection of the presence of coin-collecting in both novellas.)
- I enjoyed reading it, and will look forward to returning to it at some point, but my snap judgment is that it's a minor addition to the King canon. That's okay; not everything can be 11/22/63, and not everything should.
Beyond that, guys, I don't currently have much to say. Go check it out and let me know what you think in the comments.
Coming up soon(ish) here: an updated ranking of King's books. I promised a commenter I'd put that on the fast-track, and so I shall. See you then!